{ "measuredAt": "2026-09-26T15:18:52.347Z", "method": "One new LLM-only run per numeric inquiry versus previously recorded workflow runs. Same model and available information, different prompts and capture times. Technical checks are applied after baseline generation, not used to repair it. No human acceptance or manual baseline measured.", "presentation": "Company labels and example URLs anonymized for display; measurements refer to the original captures.", "rows": [ { "name": "complete", "inputDigest": "0a13c68ff18551c5b618c75320f5dfb9580e131e2d04bcd71f29f0ffa2707fc2", "baseline": { "model": "gpt-6-luna", "latencyMs": 17099, "technicalChecksPassed": true, "dossier": { "suppliedFacts": [ { "text": "The weekly reconciliation covers 3,000 subscriptions; two staff members each spend 4 hours per week, 240 subscriptions had discrepancies last week, and estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. The requested output is a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by the operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-problem", "excerpt": "We reconcile 3,000 subscriptions every week using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. Two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work. Last week 240 subscriptions had discrepancies. Our estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. We need a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead." }, { "text": "The stated tools are HubSpot and Stripe.", "sourceId": "inquiry-tools", "excerpt": "[\"HubSpot\",\"Stripe\"]" }, { "text": "The reconciliation frequency is weekly.", "sourceId": "inquiry-frequency", "excerpt": "weekly" }, { "text": "The workload is 3,000 CRM records, 3,000 billing records, 3,000 compared subscriptions, 240 exceptions, two reviewers, four hours per reviewer, and hourly cost of 4,500 cents.", "sourceId": "inquiry-workload", "excerpt": "{\"crmRecords\":3000,\"billingRecords\":3000,\"comparedSubscriptions\":3000,\"exceptions\":240,\"reviewers\":2,\"hoursPerReviewer\":4,\"hourlyCostCents\":4500}" } ], "sourcedFindings": [ { "text": "The snapshot identifies the prospect as a subscription analytics software provider.", "sourceId": "company-product", "excerpt": "the prospect provides subscription analytics software." } ], "fitRationale": [ { "text": "Guidance supports beginning with one repetitive workflow, defining a clear success condition, and retaining human oversight; a small paid pilot may be an appropriate discovery path. No ROI, SLA, or timeline commitments are supported.", "sourceId": "service-fit", "excerpt": "Start with one repetitive workflow, a clear success condition and a small paid pilot. Human oversight is required. Timelines follow discovery; no ROI or SLA guarantees." } ], "hypotheses": [ "Provisional hypothesis: weekly reconciliation of HubSpot CRM records against Stripe billing records may be a suitable single workflow for a read-only discrepancy report, with the operations lead reviewing results." ], "unknowns": [ "The pilot's success condition and acceptance criteria have not been specified.", "The expected report format, discrepancy categories, and handling of ambiguous or unmatched records are unknown.", "Data access method, permissions, and operational constraints are unknown." ], "questions": [ "What measurable success condition and acceptance criteria would make the pilot useful to your operations lead?", "What report format and discrepancy categories should the read-only output cover, including how unmatched or ambiguous records should be flagged?", "What data access method and permissions are available for HubSpot and Stripe?" ], "replyDraft": "Thanks for outlining the reconciliation workflow. We understand that you compare 3,000 HubSpot records with 3,000 Stripe records weekly, with two staff spending four hours each per week and 240 discrepancies reported last week. You’re seeking a read-only discrepancy report for review by your operations lead. A focused pilot could explore this workflow with human review; we would first agree on its success criteria and data access. What measurable outcome should define a useful pilot, and what report format and discrepancy categories should it include?" }, "error": null }, "workflow": { "latencyMs": 21780, "technicalChecksPassed": true, "dossier": { "suppliedFacts": [ { "text": "Company name supplied as the prospect.", "sourceId": "inquiry-company", "excerpt": "the prospect" }, { "text": "Company website supplied.", "sourceId": "inquiry-url", "excerpt": "https://company.example" }, { "text": "The team reconciles 3,000 subscriptions weekly using HubSpot CRM records and Stripe billing records; two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work. Last week 240 subscriptions had discrepancies. Estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. They need a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by their operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-problem", "excerpt": "We reconcile 3,000 subscriptions every week using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. Two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work. Last week 240 subscriptions had discrepancies. Our estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. We need a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead." }, { "text": "Tools supplied: HubSpot and Stripe.", "sourceId": "inquiry-tools", "excerpt": "[\"HubSpot\",\"Stripe\"]" }, { "text": "The workflow frequency supplied is weekly.", "sourceId": "inquiry-frequency", "excerpt": "weekly" }, { "text": "A pilot budget of EUR 5,000 is supplied; confirmation of whether this is the available or approved budget remains open.", "sourceId": "inquiry-budget", "excerpt": "EUR 5000 pilot" }, { "text": "Workload record: 3,000 CRM records, 3,000 billing records, 3,000 compared subscriptions, 240 exceptions, two reviewers, 4 hours per reviewer, and hourly cost of 4,500 cents (EUR 45).", "sourceId": "inquiry-workload", "excerpt": "{\"crmRecords\":3000,\"billingRecords\":3000,\"comparedSubscriptions\":3000,\"exceptions\":240,\"reviewers\":2,\"hoursPerReviewer\":4,\"hourlyCostCents\":4500}" } ], "sourcedFindings": [ { "text": "The company source describes the prospect as a subscription analytics software provider.", "sourceId": "company-product", "excerpt": "the prospect provides subscription analytics software." } ], "fitRationale": [ { "text": "The supplied weekly manual reconciliation is a repetitive workflow with a stated comparison volume and exception count, which could support discovery of a bounded pilot. The service guidance requires human oversight and makes no ROI or SLA guarantees; the requested read-only report reviewed by the operations lead is consistent with that oversight requirement.", "sourceId": "service-fit", "excerpt": "Start with one repetitive workflow, a clear success condition and a small paid pilot. Human oversight is required. Timelines follow discovery; no ROI or SLA guarantees." } ], "hypotheses": [ "Provisional workflow hypothesis: a pilot could compare the supplied HubSpot and Stripe records and produce a read-only discrepancy report for the operations lead to review. This is a hypothesis for discovery, not a claim that reconciliation is already automated or that the workflow is approved." ], "unknowns": [ "Whether EUR 5,000 is the available or approved pilot budget.", "How discrepancies are defined and which fields or matching rules the comparison should use.", "How the operations lead wants to review and receive the read-only report." ], "questions": [ "Is EUR 5,000 the available or approved budget for the pilot?", "How do you define a discrepancy, and which fields or matching rules should the report use?", "What format and delivery method would work for the operations lead’s read-only review?" ], "replyDraft": "Hello the prospect team,\n\nThanks for sharing the reconciliation context. I understand you reconcile 3,000 subscriptions weekly across HubSpot and Stripe, with a read-only discrepancy report for your operations lead to review. A possible first step for discussion is a bounded pilot that compares the records and surfaces discrepancies for human review.\n\nCould you clarify whether EUR 5,000 is the available or approved pilot budget? How do you define discrepancies and choose matching fields? What report format and delivery method would suit the operations lead’s review?\n\nThis is a draft for local review; scope and timing would follow discovery." } } }, { "name": "incomplete", "inputDigest": "82615c4946dc1dd4e0d7425fa4298d06cb6e2f5202d2aff58b64c67298413cc8", "baseline": { "model": "gpt-6-luna", "latencyMs": 15319, "technicalChecksPassed": true, "dossier": { "suppliedFacts": [ { "text": "The inquiry describes reconciling 3,000 subscriptions each week across 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records; two staff members each spend 4 hours weekly, and the desired output is a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by the operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-problem", "excerpt": "We reconcile 3,000 subscriptions every week using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. Two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work. We need a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead." }, { "text": "The named tools are HubSpot and Stripe.", "sourceId": "inquiry-tools", "excerpt": "[\"HubSpot\",\"Stripe\"]" }, { "text": "The stated cadence is weekly.", "sourceId": "inquiry-frequency", "excerpt": "weekly" }, { "text": "Supplied workload: 3,000 CRM records, 3,000 billing records, 3,000 compared subscriptions, exceptions unspecified, 2 reviewers, 4 hours per reviewer, and hourly cost unspecified.", "sourceId": "inquiry-workload", "excerpt": "{\"crmRecords\":3000,\"billingRecords\":3000,\"comparedSubscriptions\":3000,\"exceptions\":null,\"reviewers\":2,\"hoursPerReviewer\":4,\"hourlyCostCents\":null}" } ], "sourcedFindings": [], "fitRationale": [ { "text": "The described recurring reconciliation is a candidate for scoping as one repetitive workflow, with a clear success condition, a small paid pilot, and human oversight. The guidance calls for discovery before timelines and offers no ROI or SLA guarantees.", "sourceId": "service-fit", "excerpt": "Start with one repetitive workflow, a clear success condition and a small paid pilot. Human oversight is required. Timelines follow discovery; no ROI or SLA guarantees." } ], "hypotheses": [ "Provisional hypothesis: a read-only weekly discrepancy report comparing the supplied HubSpot and Stripe records may be a suitable initial workflow to scope; feasibility and success criteria remain unvalidated." ], "unknowns": [ "Company identity and URL are missing, so snapshot findings are not used.", "Budget is not provided.", "Exception volume and hourly cost are unspecified.", "Data access, matching rules, report format, and the operations lead’s review criteria are unspecified." ], "questions": [ "What company and URL should this inquiry be associated with?", "What budget range should we use to scope an initial paid pilot?", "How should discrepancies be matched and presented, and what should the operations lead use as the success condition for reviewing the report?" ], "replyDraft": "Thanks for outlining the weekly reconciliation workflow. You’re comparing 3,000 HubSpot CRM records with 3,000 Stripe billing records, with two staff members spending four hours each per week, and need a read-only discrepancy report for operations lead review. A focused discovery could define the matching rules, report format, and success condition, then assess a small paid pilot with human oversight. What company and URL should we associate with this request, and what budget range should we consider? We would also need to understand how the operations lead wants discrepancies presented. Timelines depend on discovery, and we can’t guarantee ROI or an SLA." }, "error": null }, "workflow": { "latencyMs": 16624, "technicalChecksPassed": true, "dossier": { "suppliedFacts": [ { "text": "The lead says it reconciles 3,000 subscriptions every week using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. It says two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work and requests a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by its operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-problem", "excerpt": "We reconcile 3,000 subscriptions every week using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. Two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work. We need a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead." }, { "text": "Tools supplied: HubSpot and Stripe.", "sourceId": "inquiry-tools", "excerpt": "[\"HubSpot\",\"Stripe\"]" }, { "text": "Supplied frequency: weekly.", "sourceId": "inquiry-frequency", "excerpt": "weekly" }, { "text": "Supplied workload record: 3,000 CRM records, 3,000 billing records, 3,000 compared subscriptions, exceptions null, 2 reviewers, 4 hours per reviewer, and hourly cost null. No exception count or hourly cost was supplied.", "sourceId": "inquiry-workload", "excerpt": "{\"crmRecords\":3000,\"billingRecords\":3000,\"comparedSubscriptions\":3000,\"exceptions\":null,\"reviewers\":2,\"hoursPerReviewer\":4,\"hourlyCostCents\":null}" } ], "sourcedFindings": [], "fitRationale": [ { "text": "The supplied guidance recommends starting with one repetitive workflow, a clear success condition, a small paid pilot, and human oversight. This may fit the described recurring reconciliation and requested human review; no automation capability or outcome is established by that guidance.", "sourceId": "service-fit", "excerpt": "Start with one repetitive workflow, a clear success condition and a small paid pilot. Human oversight is required. Timelines follow discovery; no ROI or SLA guarantees." } ], "hypotheses": [ "Provisional workflow hypothesis: compare the supplied HubSpot CRM and Stripe billing records for the 3,000 subscriptions, produce a read-only discrepancy report, and leave review and any decisions to the operations lead. This is a hypothesis to validate, not a claim that reconciliation is already automated." ], "unknowns": [ "Company identity and website are missing; identity status is unknown.", "Budget is missing and unconfirmed.", "Specific requirements and success condition for the discrepancy report are not provided.", "The workload record gives exceptions as null and hourly cost as null; no exception count or hourly cost is available.", "The record volumes and staff time are supplied figures, not verified results or achieved savings." ], "questions": [ "What is the company name and website?", "What budget range, if any, has been set aside for exploring this work?", "Which discrepancies should the report flag, and what information should it include for the operations lead's review?" ], "replyDraft": "Hello,\n\nThanks for describing the weekly reconciliation across HubSpot and Stripe and the need for a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by your operations lead. Before assessing fit, could you share your company name and website, and any budget range set aside for exploring this work? It would also help to know which discrepancies the report should flag and what information the operations lead needs to review.\n\nA possible starting point is to validate a workflow that compares the supplied records and prepares a report for human review. The scope and success condition would need to be clarified first.\n\nBest,\n" } } }, { "name": "conflicting", "inputDigest": "3e4e8a16ed3ecc103d1aa95dcf9d01d850b027661d9df7bb5dca33562cab2d05", "baseline": { "model": "gpt-6-luna", "latencyMs": 18785, "technicalChecksPassed": true, "dossier": { "suppliedFacts": [ { "text": "The inquiry describes reconciling 3,000 subscriptions weekly across HubSpot and Stripe; two staff members each spend four hours per week, and 240 subscriptions had discrepancies last week. Estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. The requested output is a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by the operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-problem", "excerpt": "We reconcile 3,000 subscriptions every week using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. Two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work. Last week 240 subscriptions had discrepancies. Our estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. We need a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead." }, { "text": "The listed tools are HubSpot and Stripe.", "sourceId": "inquiry-tools", "excerpt": "[\"HubSpot\",\"Stripe\"]" }, { "text": "The stated frequency is weekly.", "sourceId": "inquiry-frequency", "excerpt": "weekly" }, { "text": "The supplied workload lists 3,000 CRM records, 3,000 billing records, 3,000 compared subscriptions, 240 exceptions, two reviewers, four hours per reviewer, and hourly cost of 4,500 cents.", "sourceId": "inquiry-workload", "excerpt": "{\"crmRecords\":3000,\"billingRecords\":3000,\"comparedSubscriptions\":3000,\"exceptions\":240,\"reviewers\":2,\"hoursPerReviewer\":4,\"hourlyCostCents\":4500}" }, { "text": "The supplied pilot budget is EUR 5,000.", "sourceId": "inquiry-budget", "excerpt": "EUR 5000 pilot" }, { "text": "The supplied company is the prospect.", "sourceId": "inquiry-company", "excerpt": "the prospect" }, { "text": "The supplied URL is https://company.example.", "sourceId": "inquiry-url", "excerpt": "https://company.example" }, { "text": "The stated requirement is a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by the operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-requirements", "excerpt": "Read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead" } ], "sourcedFindings": [], "fitRationale": [ { "text": "The guidance recommends starting with one repetitive workflow, defining a clear success condition, using a small paid pilot, and retaining human oversight. It also says timelines follow discovery and that ROI or SLA guarantees should not be made.", "sourceId": "service-fit", "excerpt": "Start with one repetitive workflow, a clear success condition and a small paid pilot. Human oversight is required. Timelines follow discovery; no ROI or SLA guarantees." } ], "hypotheses": [ "Provisional hypothesis: weekly reconciliation may be a suitable single workflow for a read-only discrepancy report pilot, subject to confirming scope and the operations lead's review process." ], "unknowns": [ "The snapshot company is “Other Company,” while the inquiry names “the prospect”; the supplied URL matches, but company findings cannot be used until the identity discrepancy is clarified.", "No additional budget detail is available beyond the stated EUR 5,000 pilot budget.", "The success condition and discrepancy matching rules for the report are not yet specified." ], "questions": [ "The inquiry names the prospect, but the snapshot names Other Company for the same URL. Which company identity should we use?", "What specific success condition and discrepancy rules should the read-only report meet?", "Is EUR 5,000 the total available pilot budget, and are there any constraints on its scope?" ], "replyDraft": "Thanks for outlining the weekly subscription reconciliation workflow. You described comparing 3,000 HubSpot records with 3,000 Stripe records, with two staff members spending four hours each per week and 240 discrepancies last week. The desired output is a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by your operations lead. A focused pilot around this workflow could be a reasonable starting point, with the review step retained. Before discussing scope, could you clarify the company identity, since the inquiry names the prospect while the snapshot names Other Company for the same URL? It would also help to define the report’s success condition and confirm whether EUR 5,000 is the total pilot budget. Timelines would follow discovery." }, "error": null }, "workflow": { "latencyMs": 21922, "technicalChecksPassed": true, "dossier": { "suppliedFacts": [ { "text": "The supplied company name is “the prospect.”", "sourceId": "inquiry-company", "excerpt": "the prospect" }, { "text": "A website URL was supplied, but its relationship to the company identity needs review.", "sourceId": "inquiry-url", "excerpt": "https://company.example" }, { "text": "The stated problem is reconciling subscriptions manually each week, using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. Two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this work. Last week 240 subscriptions had discrepancies. The estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. The requested output is a read-only discrepancy report for review by the operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-problem", "excerpt": "We reconcile 3,000 subscriptions every week using 3,000 HubSpot CRM records and 3,000 Stripe billing records. Two staff members each spend 4 hours per week on this manual work. Last week 240 subscriptions had discrepancies. Our estimated fully loaded staff cost is EUR 45 per hour. We need a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead." }, { "text": "The supplied tools are HubSpot and Stripe.", "sourceId": "inquiry-tools", "excerpt": "[\"HubSpot\",\"Stripe\"]" }, { "text": "The supplied frequency is weekly.", "sourceId": "inquiry-frequency", "excerpt": "weekly" }, { "text": "The workload record lists 3,000 CRM records, 3,000 billing records, 3,000 compared subscriptions, 240 exceptions, 2 reviewers, 4 hours per reviewer, and an hourly cost of 4,500 cents (EUR 45). These are supplied figures; the cost is an estimate, not achieved savings, and the record does not establish that reconciliation is automated.", "sourceId": "inquiry-workload", "excerpt": "{\"crmRecords\":3000,\"billingRecords\":3000,\"comparedSubscriptions\":3000,\"exceptions\":240,\"reviewers\":2,\"hoursPerReviewer\":4,\"hourlyCostCents\":4500}" }, { "text": "A pilot budget of EUR 5,000 was supplied; confirmation and scope are not established.", "sourceId": "inquiry-budget", "excerpt": "EUR 5000 pilot" }, { "text": "The requested requirement is a read-only discrepancy report reviewed by the operations lead.", "sourceId": "inquiry-requirements", "excerpt": "Read-only discrepancy report reviewed by our operations lead" } ], "sourcedFindings": [], "fitRationale": [ { "text": "The described recurring reconciliation task is a plausible candidate to assess as one repetitive workflow with a clear success condition and a small paid pilot. Human oversight is required; timelines depend on discovery, and no ROI or SLA guarantees are provided.", "sourceId": "service-fit", "excerpt": "Start with one repetitive workflow, a clear success condition and a small paid pilot. Human oversight is required. Timelines follow discovery; no ROI or SLA guarantees." } ], "hypotheses": [ "Provisional hypothesis: a workflow could compare the supplied HubSpot and Stripe records, flag potential discrepancies in a read-only report, and leave review and disposition to the operations lead. This is a possibility for discovery, not an existing automation or confirmed requirement." ], "unknowns": [ "Company identity needs review: the supplied name is “the prospect,” but the supplied URL is https://company.example; their relationship and the correct company identity and website have not been confirmed.", "Whether the stated EUR 5,000 pilot budget is confirmed and what scope it covers.", "The desired discrepancy categories, matching rules, data access method, and success condition for the report." ], "questions": [ "Could you confirm the company’s identity and official website?", "Is the EUR 5,000 pilot budget confirmed, and what scope should it cover?", "Which discrepancy categories and matching rules should the report apply, and what would make the pilot successful?" ], "replyDraft": "Hello,\n\nThanks for sharing the reconciliation context. I understand you currently reconcile 3,000 subscriptions weekly across HubSpot and Stripe, with two staff members spending four hours each per week, and want a read-only discrepancy report for your operations lead. You reported 240 discrepancies last week and an estimated fully loaded staff cost of EUR 45 per hour; that estimate is not a claim of achieved savings.\n\nBefore assessing fit, could you confirm the company’s identity and official website? The supplied name is “the prospect” and the supplied URL is https://company.example, but I can’t confirm they identify the same company. Could you also confirm whether the EUR 5,000 pilot budget is set and what scope it covers?\n\nOne possible workflow to explore is comparing HubSpot and Stripe records, flagging potential discrepancies in a read-only report, and leaving review to your operations lead. Which discrepancy categories and matching rules should it use, and what outcome would define a successful pilot?\n\nRegards" } } } ] }